Skip to main content

Telstra lost round 1 to Apple's iPhone, now gearing for round 2 with Google's Android

The iPhone phenomenon is global and is doing well in terms of grabbing the market share from other handsets. In Australia consumer is crying, even though it’s a hit with the general public, courtesy of 3 telcos, which have got an agreement with Apple, Telstra, Optus & Vodafone. The main reason consumers are crying is that their pricing plans are the most expensive compared to the other 21 countries where iPhone 2.0 is launched. Well, there are no prizes for guessing that Telstra's plans are the most expensive plans. Most of us haven't been able to understand why Telstra is offering plans that are not suitable for a smart device like an iPhone - it's not a phone it's a mini PC.

But now it is becoming clear why this is so. It’s not widely known that Telstra negotiated hard with Apple to allow applications like Whereis (Sensis) to be preloaded on iPhone. This is the usual territory for Telstra, Being the dominant player here they get away with most of the time with their wish list, but Apple didn’t relent to their request this time. As a result of this Telstra joined the party later with other 2 Telco’s on July 11 to start offering iPhones.
Another vital aspect of Apple’s deal with carriers across the globe has been that they will charge some brokerage ($$) from carriers on each handset’s plan with them and let the price of handsets be subsidised upfront at 199 & 299 USD for new models.
From Telstra's point of view, this means less returns & margins on their network. This is not how Telstra has made money in the past. This is probably one of those rare occasions where Telstra had no choice on the negotiating table but had to agree to what Apple said. That’s why I believe Telstra lost round 1 to Apple's iPhone.

Now looking at the future, how Telstra will compete as a carrier without compromising on their terms & conditions. Well, the answer to that is Google's Android platform. This is where Telstra might be preparing. The main reasons for this are threefold.
  • Google’s revenue model is structured around online ads. It is highly unlikely that they will charge any brokerage from the carriers like Telstra. This goes well with Telstra and other carriers. As long as ads are served on a mobile platform Google will be happy.
  • Secondly, Android is not a walled garden (closed system) unlike iPhone, which has a very stringent control over what applications can be available via Apple Store. Android doesn’t have any tight control on what applications can be built using its SDK; it’s an open garden. This means Telstra not only will build applications for it but might negotiate with Google to preload its applications like Whereis instead of Google Maps. This open model will be popular but also has the potential to give some grief; Linux distributions can be seen in this context. It will be good to have some less controlled model for Android along the lines of the Wikipedia model - publish and filter model.
  • Third unlike iPhone, Android is not tied to iPhone-specific hardware; it will be available on most handsets, which is now working on the common specification under the umbrella of Open Handset Alliance (OHA).
These 3 compelling reasons make me think that Telstra might be preparing for round 2.

When I raised this issue with Paul Budde for his thoughts. This is what he said:
Telstra CEO, Sol Trujillo has said 'Google Smoogle' and see's Google as their biggest competitor in the market. Customers would want Google maps rather than Sensis maps so there are at least a few problems here that need to be solved.
It will be interesting to see how Telstra will proceed from here what ever happens it won't be easy for them as the business models are all moving towards open platforms. On a media level Telstra will never be able to compete with true media companies. They however believe that is the market they will play in, but they are not used to play in an open market, they can only be successful in markets they can dominate, if it comes to content competition in a free market Telstra will most certainly loose.

Back to the current fiasco: I will be highly surprised if Telstra changes its plans drastically which consumers want. It looks like 3 & Virgin Mobile will be the best options for iPhone either way.
iPhone carriers are in for battle similar to aviation industry is going through. Optus reseller Virgin Mobile is rumoured to offer the most consumer-friendly plans, to capture the lower end of the market. This is similar to what Qantas & Jetstar Combination is doing, not allowing other players like Virgin Blue to run away with the market share. And now Singapore Airlines with Tiger Airways are doing the same thing.
It looks like Optus has taken the leaf out of the aviation industry. Having said that I won’t be surprised if Telstra will choose the same direction/paths to counter Optus in the immediate future.

As a consumer, there is still no relief from these opportunistic Telcos who are busy making money on a global phenomenon without much effort. What do you think as a consumer? What options do we have here in the land of Green and gold?

Credit: Thanks to Paul Budde for his comments/observations.

Comments

Anonymous said…
When you thank someone for their comments and observations, maybe you should actually quote them or at least show which bits are their comments and observations.

Otherwise it looks like cheap name dropping.
Renu Sharma said…
Thanks for your input. I have now updated it with specific comments from Paul.

Popular posts from this blog

99designs - Connecting Designers from Around the World

Today we showcase an exciting and successful venture co-founded by, Mark Harbottle in 2008 from Melbourne, Australia, 99designs - it connects thousands of designers from around the world with clients who need design tasks completed fast, and without the usual high cost and limited choices you get from most traditional design firms. In a recent email-based interview with Mark, he gave insights into his venture and how he is progressing with it. This is what he has to say: • Please tell us about yourself, your background and interests? I’m 34 years old. I have a degree in computer systems engineering. I started my wo rking life as a programmer, but I eventually found I was much better at online marketing, which back in 1995 was an area not many people had explored. I’ve worked with pure internet businesses for 13 years now. The first 4 years after I graduated I worked with one of Australia’s first internet companies, and the last 9 have been spent working on my own businesses. I started

Matt Ireland, Aussie Entrepreneur - Owner of 3 Successful Ventures

Today we showcase the story of an entrepreneur with 3 successful ventures under his belt, Matthew Ireland, founder of eTradesman.com.au , MineOnline.com.au & LawyerLink.com.au from Sydney, Australia. In a candid interview with us, he explained how as an entrepreneur he is managing and juggling. This is what he has to say in his interview with us : • Please tell us about yourself, your background and interests? I’m Matt Ireland, founder and manager of eTradesman.com.au , MineOnline.com.au & LawyerLink.com.au . Based between Sydney & Newcastle I have a huge passion and interest in the possibilities and developments of the Internet and am always keen to read up on entrepreneurs and people who have been there and done it. Huge sports fan outside of ‘work’ and enjoy a beer with friends and family. • What is the name of your venture/company? Our current portfolio of online businesses includes  eTradesman.com.au , Mi neOnlin e.com.au & LawyerLink.com.au – stay focused on

Plutext

The 9th participant is Plutext . Plutext enables collaborative editing around docx documents, where docx is the default file format in Word 2007. In simple terms, it's a word processor like Openoffice Writer and Google Docs. Based out of Melbourne, it was created by Jason Harrop in 2007 and this is the second venture he has started, previously he was involved with SpeedLegal (now Exari). Let us explore a bit further about Plutext from Jason, on various facets of his startup: Q. How long it took before it was up and running? A. A couple of months to build a proof of concept, whilst also doing other things, before giving it 100% focus in September 2007. Q. What stage of your start-up is, stealth mode, beta mode or fully functional? A. Beta mode. Q. What is the main objective/mission behind your venture? A. Enable people to work on a Word document at the same time. Provide an environment for doing this irrespective of whether you have Word 2007. Q. What is unique about your ventu